Lesson Structure
1. Introduction to Ideation
2. The Ideation Process
Introduce the stages:
Ideation flowchart:
[Problem] → [Brainstorm] → [Cluster] → [Select] → [Refine]
3. Ideation Techniques (20 min)
Introduce and demonstrate 2–3 methods:
Activity: Break into small groups and apply one technique to a challenge (e.g., “How might we reduce food waste in schools?”)
4. Apply the Okurut Ideation Test
The Need/Opportunity
What is the community pain level from
(
The OKurut Pain and emotional Indicators by Pain Level
|
Pain Level |
Common Emotions |
Language Cues |
|---|---|---|
|
1–3 |
Mild annoyance, confusion |
“It’s not ideal…” “I guess it works…” |
|
4–6 |
Frustration, resignation |
“We’ve learned to live with it…” “It’s a hassle.” |
|
7–10 |
Anger, fear, urgency |
“We can’t take this anymore.” “Something has to change.” That solution, idea which will solve this need is the golden opportunity, you see it take it and run with with. |
DESIRABILITY:
Do people want it?
Indicators of Desirability
|
Signal Type |
Examples |
What It Tells You |
|---|---|---|
|
Verbal Signals |
“I wish we had something like this.” |
Expressed interest or emotional resonance |
|
Behavioral Signals |
People sign up, share, show up, or pay attention |
Willingness to engage or invest |
|
Workarounds |
DIY hacks, informal systems, community-led alternatives |
Unmet need with creative demand |
|
Adoption Trends |
Early users stick around, word-of-mouth spreads |
Organic growth and sustained interest |
|
Feedback Quality |
Constructive suggestions, emotional language (“love,” “hate,” “need”) |
Passionate engagement, not indifference |
. Surveys & Interviews
2. Prototype Testing
3.Emotional Mapping
Desirability vs. Pain Level
|
Pain Level |
Desirability Potential |
|---|---|
|
1–3 |
Low urgency, may need storytelling to spark desire |
|
4–6 |
Moderate desire, people open to better alternatives |
|
7–10 |
High desire, people actively seeking solutions |
(1 = No interest, 10 = Deep craving)
FEASIBILITY:
Can we build it?
Now we are rounding out the three pillars of innovation:
Let’s dive into Feasibility and build a clear framework to assess whether your idea or solution is realistically achievable.
Feasibility Assessment Framework
Key Question:
Can we build, deliver, and maintain this solution with the resources we have—or can get?
Dimensions of Feasibility
|
Dimension |
Questions to Ask |
Signals of Feasibility |
|---|---|---|
|
Technical Feasibility |
Do we have the skills, tools, and infrastructure to build it? |
Existing tech stack, available talent, proven methods |
|
Financial Feasibility |
Can we afford to build and sustain it? What’s the cost vs. benefit? |
Budget alignment, funding sources, cost estimates |
|
Time Feasibility |
Can we build it in a reasonable timeframe? |
Clear milestones, realistic deadlines |
|
Operational Feasibility |
Can we deliver and support it at scale? |
Staffing, logistics, partnerships |
|
Legal & Ethical Feasibility |
Are there regulations, risks, or ethical concerns to address? |
Compliance, community trust, risk mitigation |
How to Measure Feasibility
1. Resource Inventory
2. Risk Assessment
3. Pilot Testing
Feasibility vs. Pain & Desirability
|
Pain Level |
Desirability |
Feasibility |
Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
|
High |
High |
Low |
Big opportunity, but needs investment or innovation |
|
Medium |
Medium |
Medium |
Good candidate for incremental improvement |
|
Low |
Low |
High |
Easy to build, but may not be worth it |
diagnostic tool:
Can We Build It?
(Check all that apply)
[ ] We have the technical skills
[ ] We have the budget or funding path
[ ] We can deliver it within 6–12 months
[ ] We have partners or staff to support it
[ ] It complies with laws and community values
Feasibility Score (1–10):
(1 = Not feasible, 10 = Ready to launch)
VIABILITY
Will it sustain itself?
๐ Dimensions of Viability
|
Dimension |
Questions to Ask |
Signals of Viability |
|---|---|---|
|
๐ฐ Financial Viability |
Will it generate revenue, funding, or cost savings? |
Revenue model, funding pipeline, ROI |
|
๐งญ Strategic Viability |
Does it align with long-term goals, trends, or mission? |
Strategic fit, market timing, scalability |
|
๐ง๐ค๐ง Stakeholder Viability |
Will key players (users, funders, partners) support it long-term? |
Buy-in, partnerships, advocacy |
|
๐ Operational Viability |
Can it be maintained without burnout or breakdown? |
Staffing, systems, repeatability |
|
๐ฑ Social & Environmental Viability |
Does it contribute positively to society or the planet? |
Ethical impact, sustainability, community trust |
๐งช How to Measure Viability
1. Business Model Canvas
2. Sustainability Forecast
3. Stakeholder Mapping
๐ Viability vs. Desirability & Feasibility
|
Scenario |
Implication |
|---|---|
|
High Desirability + High Feasibility + Low Viability |
Great idea, but needs a better business model or funding strategy |
|
High Viability + Low Desirability |
Sustainable but irrelevant—may need repositioning |
|
High Viability + Low Feasibility |
Worth pursuing if resources can be mobilized |
๐งญ Viability Worksheet Section
Add this to your diagnostic tool:
Will It Sustain Itself?
(Check all that apply)
Viability Score (1–10): โฌ
(1 = Unsustainable, 10 = Long-term success likely)
๐ง Bonus: Innovation Scoring Matrix
You can now combine all three dimensions:
|
Dimension |
Score (1–10) |
|---|---|
|
Desirability |
โฌ |
|
Feasibility |
โฌ |
|
Viability |
โฌ |
Total Score: โฌ / 30
How to Measure Viability
1. Business Model Canvas
2. Sustainability Forecast
3. Stakeholder Mapping
Would you like this turned into a full innovation dashboard, pitch template, or decision-making guide? I can help you build it into a visual tool or interactive worksheet.
Activity: Groups present their top idea and get feedback using a simple rubric.
5. Reflection & Wrap-Up (10 min)
Optional Extensions